Jury finds Rittenhouse not guilty

The minute the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict was in, my Telegram notifications exploded.

 “NOT FUCKING GUILTY!!!!” The Proud Boys wrote in their national account.

 “In a time where we rarely see justice anymore, Kyle’s verdict gives me some hope,” wrote Joey Gibson, leader of the far-right brawlers, Patriot Prayer.

On Twitter, Idaho militia leader Eric Parker wrote, “From now on at my house, November 19 will be known as Kyle’s Day.”

Some groups shared a meme of Rittenhouse’s face superimposed on Leonardo DiCaprio’s body raising a toast in the movie “The Great Gatsby” with fireworks in the background.

Telegram is a favored social media site of the far right, ranging from militias to Proud Boys chapters to white supremacists. And Rittenhouse — he’s been the favored hero and, until Friday, martyr for many of these groups.

Rittenhouse, of course, is the Illinois teen who went to Kenosha, Wis. in August, 2020 during unrest there with his semi-automatic rifle, apparently on a self-styled security mission. The town was in the midst of protests and rioting after the police shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man.

The facts of the Rittenhouse case are not in dispute: Rittenhouse, then 17, shot three people, killing two, and shot at one more person but missed. What was up for debate was whether his actions were justified. He claimed self-defense, and the jury agreed after three days of deliberations. On Friday they found Rittenhouse not guilty on all five counts, including two counts of murder.

Many militia leaders and other activists in the far-right Patriot Movement saw Rittenhouse’s case as a test of both the Second Amendment and self-defense rights. Rittenhouse said he was acting out what many of these groups see as their role: civil defense in the absence of robust policing.

“Militias see Rittenhouse as the embodiment of what they purport to stand for — the ability to carry weapons openly and ‘defend’ individual life and property,” said Colin Clarke, director of policy and research at The Soufan Group, which studies domestic and foreign extremism. “It’s essentially a legitimization of vigilantism, though — it opens the door to more of the same activity.”

Friday’s verdict brought celebrations from across the movement, but they had been cheering him along almost from the start. 

That only increased when photos emerged of Rittenhouse posing with the proto-fascist Proud Boys at a bar while out on bail, even flashing the “OK” sign popular with white nationalists.

During the trial some far-right commentators, like Steven Crowder of Louder With Crowder, even provided live commentary and reactions. 

There were daily updates with reactions to rulings and mockery of the prosecutors. On the internet, at least, Rittenhouse was a great rallying cry.

However, the Rittenhouse trial has been a surprising flop when it came to mobilizing these groups. Militia leaders from as far away from Idaho urged people to go to Kenosha and show support. But it seems few heeded the call.

I was there at the beginning of the trial, expecting a powder keg of far-right supporters and counter-protesters who wanted to see Rittenhouse held to account.

Instead, there were a handful of local Rittenhouse supporters and supporters of Jacob Blake who saw potential not-guilty verdicts for Rittenhouse as a slap in the face for the justice they believe Blake has been denied.

Those crowds grew a little as the verdict neared, but the influx of militia members and other far-right activists never materialized.

Now, we’ll see if the result some worry about and others want – more people armed in the streets taking security into their own hands — is confined mostly to talk online.